| brian carroll on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:39:33 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> commercial communism |
hi ivo. read your essay on nettime and
you write about a fusion of sorts, as:
'The entire communism/dictatorship -
free-market/democracy polarization
is just an illusion...'
.US corporations have long seemed to have
become communal organizations by way of
childcare, housing, eating, healthclubs,
recreation when off work with employees,
etc. and the role of ideology in culture
is reinforced by these same mechanisms.
i've wondered if it is because 'capitalism'
is not so much the corollary to communism,
though both of these seem to be economic-
based (or at least grand narratives for
why communism ('the wall') fell, due to
economic stagnation, etc). instead, it
would seem that capitalism|socialism are
one dynamic, capital being economic and
socialism being social, social-capital
being the politics of that dynamic.
whereas to me it seems that commercialism
functions ideologically in step/queue with
communism as a central organizing function-
lock-step marching into oblivion as a basis
for policy, for social issues, economics,
politics- a type of extreme economics that
forces itself as a social plan by force.
thus, some hybrid variant potentially being
'commercial communism' that is in opposition
to different cultural principles of 'social
capitalism', the latter being grounded in
ideas while the former is an ideological
operation functioning as automated machine.
i realize everyone knows a lot more about
these things than i though the concepts are
brought up within the context of daily living
in the .us in this way, in my experience and
your essay accesses this view, at least imo.
maybe this is entirely wrong to experts yet
it is more truly the situation than arcane
historical arguments that cannot be placed
in the present, such as tv commercials.
(which, by the way, are heavily advertising
Homeland Security jobs as a growth industry.)
brian
[plus, there's serious protectionism now in
existing industries/professions to keep things
unchanged. one example of total corruption is
the field of architecture, where the professors
are celebrity architects, schools are intern-
ship mechanisms and also places for jobs to
be sketched out by students for pilfering by
firms, whose architects also are on committees
who give themselves awards, run organizations,
magazines to officiate and authenticate what
are the credentials and licenses needed for
a legal practice. if one does not agree with
the ideology you cannot work in this field.
it is completely controlled and representative
of a modern commercialist ideology run amuck.]
brian thomas carroll: research-design-development
architecture, education, electromagnetism
http://www.mnartists.org/brian_carroll
http://www.electronetwork.org/bc/
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net